A month ago it snowed in Chicago, and Megan urged that I should take a winter coat with me: it would likely be cold during my stay. It wasn’t, of course, and save for the last two days the coat had remained on the hanger in the cupboard. The sun had shone on my entire vacation in more than one way.
Now, less than two weeks after my homecoming, hail colors the streets white while snow and wind try to persuade the sensibility inside us all to stay home. Chicago has been drained from my veins and washed from my pores. All that remains are the frames I just bought with my parents to envelop images of history: Lincoln postcards and Obama frontpages of Chicago newspapers. Lest we forget.
To my left lies a “book lover’s kit” and recentely purchased gifts for Sinterklaas; to my right, there’s an empty lunch box, a devoured pack of cookies, and a magical memory enhancer, my camera; in front of me, my collected blogs wait ever impatiently to be translated and elaborated. That’s what I will be spending my evenings on, as well as chunks of my days off.
My love for Lincoln has developed in a similar fashion as my friendship with Megan, namely richer and more multifaceted, more lively; beyond the abstract, bookish interest, I have all but pinched the cheek of Lincoln Statues and looked in awe at inspiration poured into bronze, moulded into plaster, or carved into wood. I’ve walked the wood of New Salem and listened to the voices of dissent and disapproval in the Lincoln Presidential Museum. This has made a lot of difference.
In the past few days, another dimension has been added: American newspapers and magazines seem unable to escape the comparisons between Obama and Lincoln. The 16th president has been invoked by the president-elect, in that Obama has admitted that he has been reading about Lincoln and found him inspiring and wise, but the media either liken several character traits of the fourth Illinois-related president (Grant lived there; Reagan was born there) to the first, or they call upon Obama to be a lot like Lincoln.
“Team of Rivals” has become a magical phrase to indicate the impending cabinet, named after the title of Goodwin’s book about the men who Lincoln chose to govern with. Some of them were staunch political opponents, who Lincoln sought to unite and place on the best possible position. Quality over partisanship, in other words, and Obama has declared that he seeks to install the best people to counter the crises, crossing the party aisle on at least one and perhaps more occasions.
“Team of Rivals,” although already a best-seller before, saw sales increase after Obama mentioned it on his campaign, because thus far, everything Obama touches seems to turn into gold. A single mention of a book about FDR’s first 100 days sold out another book about the same topic, urging the publisher to reprint it. Not only is he the new President, he appears to have become a new Oprah as well: creating best-sellers where he goes.
Of course, he is still the president-elect, and not much can be said yet about the policies that Obama will implement. All we have is the people he picks to govern with him, and an interview he gave on 60 minutes. Not many people I talked to have seen it, perhaps because it invokes the thought of listening to an entire hour of Q-and-A. The entire interview lasts only slightly longer than half an hour, I think, and if one is easily bored, I advise them to at least watch the first part, which is only 15 minutes.
When I watched him speak, I was thoroughly impressed. It was refreshing to see a considerate, nuanced and insightful successor to the current president, who is known for his disinterest in reading and thinks tenacity is an unshakable virtue. Consider the following by Obama, for example:
“I don’t want to get bottled up in ideology: is this liberal or is this conservative. I am interested in finding something that works. And whether it’s coming from FDR or it’s coming from Ronald Reagan, if the idea is right for the times then we’re gonna apply it. And things that don’t work we’re gonna get rid of. “
Of course we still have to wait and see what will happen, especially with such a majority in Congress (and the opportunity to push through a lot of left-leaning policies), but at least it sounds a lot better than a president who will stick with a given policy for party-ideological reasons, no matter what.
I can’t possibly quote the entire interview (just go and watch it), but I can’t help ending this blog with words that answer effectively the much-heard critique that Obama was all talk and no action. To the question if the people were to expect a lot of speeches, Obama answers:
“I’m not sure that the American people are looking for a lot of speeches. I think what they’re looking for is action. But one of the things that I do think is important is to be able to explain to the American people what you’re doing, and why you’re doing it. That is something that I think every great president has been able to do. From FDR to Lincoln to John Kennedy to Eisenhower.”
Incidentally, Lincoln did not like speaking in public, but he produced some of the most eloquent speeches heard in American History. Let’s hope the president-elect will cherish a care for words that will save them for the right occasion, and then give us reason to write 10-volume collections of his works. Let’s hope, too, that he will give reason to be as much praised as the predecessor whose bicentennial we’re celebrating around his inauguration. It would simultaneously flood the media with justified comparisons between the two, and ultimately stop newspapers and magazines from doing so, because his merits would prove significant enough to be praised singularly and standing alone, not merely by association.







